When it comes to the web, everyone’s a critic. Most people form a negative or positive opinion of a site in about the same time it takes to click a mouse (according to a Carleton University study).
It’s a skill we’ve developed by visiting countless websites with different objectives in mind, fostered by the accessibility, necessity and diversity of the internet. Referring to the latter enabler, Mitchell Kapor, CEO of Lotus Software, said it best: getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant. If websites are the objects of our praise (or in some cases, the sources of our frustration), certainly there is no shortage of material. This is not meant to discredit the importance of evaluating websites, but rather meant as a segue to showing that different approaches, skill-sets, and criteria must be used to evaluate intranets.